User talk:173.29.78.126

May 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * What I you talk about? 173.29.78.126 (talk) 02:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I realized you may refer to my edit of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaud_Camus.
 * I read about him on this page and based on his biography he has been a member and has been associated with Socialist parties and movement in France.
 * Socialism is on the left of politics.
 * Thus I thought that is is misleading to the readers that his invention - the "Great Replacement" is described as a far-right conspiracy theory.
 * I noticed that you reverted my change what is the logic for this? 173.29.78.126 (talk) 03:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Camus’s affiliations we’re not fixed, and in any case the conspiracy theory is not dependent on the politics of one person. No sources call the conspiracy theory a left wing idea. Don’t substitute your own analysis for sources. It’s disruptive.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * "Camus’s affiliations we’re not fixed, and in any case the conspiracy theory is not dependent on the politics of one person."
 * This sentence does not make sense, especially that Renaud Camus is not "one person" but based on the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaud_Camus he is the inventor of the theory. At least his theory should be left without any association. I think people should not be mislead by this. 173.29.78.126 (talk) 03:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Your own interpretations and inferences are not admissible - sources are required, and the sources available are reflected int he article. If you can find reliable, mainstream sources that differ, bring them forth. Otherwise, you're wasting your time and ours.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There are two articles from CNN and Politico published today:
 * https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/21/politics/diverse-democracies-mounk-blake-cec/index.html
 * "But there is a variant of replacement theory that has also moved into the mainstream -- and it's celebrated by people on the left as well, says Yascha Mounk, author of a provocative new book, "The Great Experiment: Why Diverse Democracies Fall Apart and How They Can Endure."
 * "Over the past days ... (replacement theory) has, for very good reason, been widely condemned," Mounk says. "But the uncomfortable truth is that a less conspiratorial cousin of it has long been embraced in mainstream public discourse. In fact, it is one of the few things that both liberals and conservatives, both Democrats and Republicans, can now agree on."
 * https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/05/21/buffalo-massacre-great-replacement-segregation-00034177
 * The 18-year-old white male shooter was radicalized by the “great replacement” theory that nearly half of Republicans and a quarter of Democrats now believe to some extent 173.29.78.126 (talk) 02:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That's interesting. It might be worth discussing on the article talkpage to see what other editors think. W Acroterion   (talk)   02:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)