User talk:173.35.163.151

March 2023
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed content from Raheem Sterling without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:13, 16 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Riyad Mahrez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 20:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Your recent editing history at Ke Huy Quan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''There is extensive discussion of this matter on the talk page. It appears that the currently agreed-upon version does not include "Vietnamese", so please stop adding it back.'' Actualcpscm (talk) 12:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Raheem Sterling, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Raheem Sterling. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 14:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Clyde H. Mapping. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Oscar Isaac—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Clyde H. Mapping (talk) 12:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 13:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2023
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steven Yeun, you may be blocked from editing. resumed off block Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 19:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2024
Hello, I'm Ternera. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Steven Yeun—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ternera (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Choi Woo-shik. Thank you.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  04:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)