User talk:173.48.197.65

December 2018
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Medea Benjamin, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for pushing an agenda which is not compatible with the task of writing and maintaining a neutral encyclopaedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 23:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2019
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Block: one month Vsmith (talk) 11:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Unblock|| My edit are not pc but they are constructive.[[Special:Contributions/173.48.197.

May 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Seeing that your one-month block expired only yesterday and you are making the exact same kind of disruptive edits, you only need one warning - stop trolling or your next block will probably be longer. bonadea contributions talk 10:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have broken no rules. Look instead to the administrators who are.173.48.197.65 (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for continued disruptive and POV edits on Medea Benjamin, as done at Medea Benjamin. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 22:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

{{ unblock| It seems to be a contiued block. I put a post on a talk page on Bill Koch and I am blocked.173.48.197.65 (talk) 15:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1= I am being blocked with no explanation or warning. | decline = The block is in place to prevent you from popping in to Wikipedia every so often to push an agenda and make the same POV comments. This talk page, as well as your block log, explain why the block is necessary. As the block is preventing continued disruption there is no reason to lift it. Jezebel's Ponyo {{sup| bons mots }} 21:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed |1=What disruption. Acotereon has no right to block. He has been reported on as a administrator who violates the rules.173.48.197.65 (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC) |decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
 * the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
 * the block is no longer necessary because you
 * understand what you have been blocked for,
 * will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
 * will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|decline=No, it isn't; it's entirely appropriate. We can all see the continual insertion of non-WP:NPOV material from your IP. --jpgordon{{sup| &#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; }} 23:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)|1=I was never given a reason or an explanation on why my constructive additions mostly to talk pages were considered disruptive, this is admin abuse.}}173.48.197.65 (talk) 23:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

You keep saying that but you have yet to give an example.173.48.197.65 (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=block&page=User:{{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} block log] • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=search&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} active blocks] • [{{fullurl:Special:GlobalBlockList|ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [{{fullurl:Special:AbuseLog|wpSearchUser={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} abuse filter log] • [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=newusers&user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} creation log] • change block settings • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=unblock&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} unblock] • [{{fullurl:Special:CheckUser|user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&reason={{urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}, unblock request}}}} checkuser] ([{{fullurl:Special:CheckUserLog|cuSearchType=target&cuSearch={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} log]) ) {{clear}}

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.