User talk:173.48.221.164

October 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Maxie Baughan, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 01:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Maxie Baughan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Maxie Baughan, you may be blocked from editing. Ham tech  person  02:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Maxie Baughan. Ham tech  person  02:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. at Maxie Baughan per a complaint at WP:AIV. EdJohnston (talk) 03:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)