User talk:173.52.229.165

April 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Whittlesey culture. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. EnIRtpf09b (talk) 10:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Whittlesey culture. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 10:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I will not How about you stop putting false history cuz nothing on this whittlesey post is true I'm a Native American person and I don't like how you're spewing a bunch of garbage nonsense there was never a tribe called whittlesey there was never a culture called whittlesey either Charles whittlesey did not found theCharles Whittlesey was not the founder of the Western Reserve Historical Society. He was a member of the Society, however, and served as its president from 1864 to 1868. Charles Whittlesey was from Cleveland, Ohio and was of English descent. There is no evidence of a Native American tribe by the name of Whittlesey located in Ohio. It appears that the claim is likely false. foundation y'all are claiming he found on this post either 173.52.229.165 (talk) 11:01, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add commentary to articles, as you did at Whittlesey culture, you may be blocked from editing. ButterCashier (talk) 10:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I will not How about you stop posting false information you dumbass 173.52.229.165 (talk) 11:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 10:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This info is wrong and inaccurate and somebody keeps changing it back after people change it and put actual history
none of this info is accurate 173.52.229.165 (talk) 10:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Instead of edit warring, there are ways to address your concerns that are within policy. You should first discuss any concerns about your edits being removed on the article talk page, not simply restore them because you think they should be. To be unblocked, please follow the instructions in the block notice. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 11:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.