User talk:173.61.78.61

April 2019
Hello. Your recent edit to List of Christian theologians appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:18, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Christian theologians, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 00:45, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of Christian theologians. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 02:40, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edits
(Copied over from my talk page, since you may not see my reply to you there)
 * Hello, IP editor. I see you have been (repeatedly) attempting to add this individual to a list. If you look at the other list items, you will see that they link to existing articles, because wikipedia is not a repository of random people. I did a quick check on the individual you are attempting to add, and did not see the sort of reliable source coverage that would demonstrate notability and justify his inclusion. If you know of such sources, you would be much better served to create an article incorporating those sources than to keep adding his name onto a list without any supporting sources. That being said, I note that the individual in question previously had a page, which was deleted because it did not demonstrate his notability, so be aware that an article without solid sourcing will probably be deleted again. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:06, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Repeatedly adding non-notable names
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. DMacks (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Christian theologians. PohranicniStraze (talk) 01:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)