User talk:173.66.204.41

December 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Challenge: Battle for a New Champion—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Hasan Minhaj have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 06:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Mean Girls (2024 film)
Stop adding "mixed to positive" on pages that is SOURCED WITH MIXED RECEPTION. Oh yeah, and we go by what the based on credit says. No need to list every work it is based on in the lead. Most of your edits end up being reverted by multiple editors, which is very telling. Keep this track record up and it won't be surprising that you are blocked.  Mike  Allen   17:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Discuss here and stop edit warring or you will be reported. YOU are adding content that goes against what sources say.  Don't accuse me of "owning" a page just because I make sure guidelines and policies are followed.  Mike   Allen   18:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Stop talking to me in edit summaries. This is what a TALK PAGE is for.  I said you are adding content that goes against what sources say, as in the "mixed to positive" reception.  I don't care about it being written that it is based on the book. If no one else has an issue with it, then so be it.  It. Is. Ok.  No need for 10 sources.  Mike   Allen   18:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Rachael Ray (talk show). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The same applies, of course, to any other page, but this is the one where you have most recently been edit-warring. JBW (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.