User talk:173.71.132.122

Ummmm.....
Can anyone make this better: "Other arguments against misanthropy are based not on whether this attitude appropriately reflects the negative value of humanity but on the costs of accepting a position associated with hatred, for the individual and for society at large."

What is the point of highlighting basis by defining what it isn't? 173.71.132.122 (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Butlerblog. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Twelve Tribes communities. Redlinks are useful and can often be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" link (in the tools listed at the left in desktop view) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. ''Additionally, the "spammy" code you mentioned was actually a legitimate reference citation citing the source for the information in the article. Sources are a critical part of Wikipedia articles (see WP:VERIFY). References should not be removed without a valid reason, and most often would require discussion to remove. Make sure you know what a reference citation is and what it looks like (WP:IC). If you are unsure or have questions, reach out and ask either on the article talk page, or the Tea House (WP:TEA) where you can ask for help.''  Butler Blog   (talk) 14:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh no, 173.71.132.122. You’ve been Butlerblogged! My vision for Wikipedia: less people who attach themselves to your page like a dingoberry and who engage in group think just making the same gripes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.254.215.233 (talk) 23:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)