User talk:173.73.191.74

Hey there! I've just seen your edits to the Feature selection and Shapley value pages. I've reverted those edits since they seem to be promotions of a particular research paper, rather than presenting unbiased facts. This is not in line with the values of Wikipedia, please have a look at the Advocacy page. If you still think there's a relevant contribution to be made about the content of that paper you've been citing, then please feel free to edit the articles again in a way that is less promotional and possibly cites several resources. Most likely it should fit in to the existing structures of the articles and not be a completely new section. If in doubt, you can ask on the respective talk pages, whether the contribution is really relevant. Many research papers are published on the mentioned topics, and their Wikipedia articles can't reflect the results and suggestions of every single paper. If you have any questions, feel free to ask either here or on my talk page. Ception (talk) 14:40, 16 March 2020 (UTC)