User talk:173.75.243.13

September 2017
The content is well-sourced by three wp:reliable sources including the Washington Post. Check references before deleting cited content. Your wp:edit summary is misleading. Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed content from Stephen Miller (political advisor) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 00:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Stephen Miller (political advisor), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

See wp:BRD for how to proceed. Your reverts suggest you are wp:edit warring Jim1138 (talk) 02:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Stephen Miller (political advisor). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 02:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Stephen Miller (political advisor). Jim1138 (talk) 02:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Stephen Miller (political advisor) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JQ Triple7  talk  02:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Stephen Miller (political advisor). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 10:20, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm NewEnglandYankee. I noticed that you recently removed content from Paul Joseph Watson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alisyn Camerota, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 01:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alisyn Camerota, you may be blocked from editing. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 01:14, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , I just went and reported the IP after the first edit already. They are clearly here just to be disruptive. NZFC  (talk) 01:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * , I wouldn't disagree. But, as I had a previous involvement with this editor--see above--I'm treading cautiously here. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 01:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 01:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Juan Williams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 03:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Stelter, you may be blocked from editing. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:37, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carl Benjamin, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 23:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ana Navarro, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Albert Pujols. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rivertorch FIREWATER  05:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Manute Bol, you may be blocked from editing. Rivertorch FIREWATER  05:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chris Long.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)