User talk:173.76.57.10

July 2021
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey friend, I've been watching this article for a while and actually improved the gun store controversy. It doesn't need someone's "point of view".  The section speaks for itself and readers will judge if it is fair or not. If you keep adding that non-notable person's opinion you're going to get bonked so please give it a break.  Your point it completely made without that.  Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

DOn't call me Friend. The council person said her opinion about "nothing is the right location".. Pure opinion. The labeling him as non-notable is another opinion. You in no way "improved the controversy". I will keep adding it until it stays or I get blocked. I don't care.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * seems like Acro didn't like the cited content I added. I guess it was triggered by factual information.  Shit like this is why nobody takes wikipedia seriously


 * When your edits are challenge, you need to discuss the matter to reach consensus. It was your unwillingness to discuss that led to your account being blocked, although edits like this one were also a factor. —C.Fred (talk) 01:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Edit-warring is a bright-line disruption, and declaring that you'll keep doing it until you have your way is worse. Then there's the "Idiots" edit. The entire section, on both sides of the issue, looks like a violation of WP:NOTNEWS, but edit-warring isn't how that gets resolved. I've removed the section and left a note on the talkpage.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Newton, Massachusetts have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Newton, Massachusetts was changed by 173.76.57.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85421 on 2021-07-08T00:43:58+00:00

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 00:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.