User talk:173.79.162.223

February 2021
Hello, I'm Jr8825. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ottoman countercoup of 1909, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jr8825 •  Talk  02:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ottoman countercoup of 1909. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.    — Paper9oll  (📣 • 📝)  16:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I did not commit Vandalism
Excuse me, on Ottoman Countercoup (1909), I have not committed vandalism, vandalism, according to Wikipedia itself is deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose which I was not trying to do, Wikipedia says it's main goal is to share all human knowledge, which i was also trying to do. Let me know if there is anything i can see.173.79.162.223 (talk) 01:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You removed 1 reference and also added huge chunk of blank space hence your edit was reverted. Don't anyhow removed reference without providing a valid reason in doing so, it's okay to replaced the reference if you feel it is not a reliable source or the source is already dead and unaccessible. In addition, your edits is welcome however please follow the WP:MOS guidelines and don't add huge chunk of spaces as that is consider vandalism.  — Paper9oll  (📣 • 📝)  01:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * It is also noted that you initially received level 1 warning from Jr8825 for adding content without providing reliable source hence level 2 warning was automatically issued by me, this is standard procedure.  — Paper9oll  (📣 • 📝)  01:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the information! I just realized the source does not counter my text added

March 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at 31 March Incident. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

That's excactly what i did

Hello, I'm Ahmetlii. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Kingdom of Hejaz because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Ahmetlii (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ottoman countercoup of 1909. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Gladamas (talk &middot; contribs) 12:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Gladams Isn't that Excactly what i did?

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 31 March Incident, you may be blocked from editing. Jr8825 •  Talk  07:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

New message from Jr8825
Jr8825 •  Talk  16:09, 26 April 2021 (UTC)