User talk:173.79.202.249/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Sept. 15th
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

- I found that some of the formatting was distracting. For example, from the very beginning the article starts with a heading that reads "Jesuits were not Banderaites!!" - this to me appears more as a biased exclamation than a supported claim, the (two) exclamation points are found rather biased since they greatly convey a particular sentiment towards the topic.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

- In addition, some of the edits mention that some of the citations listed as support did not actually mention those statements.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

- However, I personally found that most facts (that were cited) were, in fact, appropriately cited and referenced back to the original source; with the exception of a few sentences that did not have citations.

Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

- There are plenty of conversations having to do with suggestions for improving the article - from editing, to formatting, to citation correcting - on the talk page. There were also people contributing to the the topic by either mentioning a source or by simply writing out more information about the topic while indicating the sources that they used.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? - This article is, in fact, part of WikiProjects Brazil. In addition, it has been rated a B-Class based on project's quality scale and of Mid-importance based on the importance scale.