User talk:173.80.218.106

July 2019
Hello, I'm DavidBrooks. Your recent edit(s) to the page Kirsten Gillibrand appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. David Brooks (talk) 22:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kirsten Gillibrand. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. James-the-Charizard (talk) 18:09, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kirsten Gillibrand, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. James-the-Charizard (talk) 18:14, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. N.J.A.  &#124; talk  18:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)