User talk:173.89.137.51

November 2013
Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fascism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Neil N  talk to me  00:41, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Capitalization rules
First, the rules Wikipedia uses for capitalization are listed at MOS:CAPS. Second, changing the title of an album such as Step Up to the Microphone to Step Up To The Microphone in prose would be unacceptable based on those rules, but you changed the capitalization to a link and Step Up To The Microphone doesn't even exist and more than the other article links of which you changed the capitalization, so you broke the article. Please pay attention when editing and know what you're doing and how it affects the project. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Is Genesis History?—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Andethyst  (talk)  19:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC) Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)