User talk:174.0.216.163

Caillou Pettis
Actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they've had roles — the notability test for an actor is the degree to which reliable sources have or have not done journalism that is about him and his performances in those roles, not just the ability to technically verify that he's been in stuff. Most of the links you've been spamming everybody's talk page with are not reliable or notability-supporting sources at all — for example, blogs are not permissible as sourcing for Wikipedia articles, so things like Guacamoley and PopHorror and FlickeringMyth don't count for anything, and people don't automatically get into Wikipedia just because they have profiles on IMDb or Rotten tomatoes either. And the few that are actually reliable sources are not covering Caillou Pettis in a noteworthy context — people also do not get into Wikipedia just because they've had one or two pieces of human interest coverage written about something they tweeted. So exactly zero of these links count as substantive support for his notability as an actor at all. People get into Wikipedia by having media coverage about them doing notable stuff, not just by being technically verifiable on the web. And specifically because you've been so persistent about trying to get yourself into Wikipedia for publicity purposes in the past, you are really going to have to make a very solid case for notability, based on much better sources than you've ever shown before, to actually get back in the door — basically, until you can actually honestly claim to have an Oscar or Canadian Screen Award nomination for your acting or filmmaking, don't even try it. Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)