User talk:174.101.165.162

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I find it very rude when no editor takes the time to properly welcome a new member, so here it is. Thank you for your contributions so far. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I'm going to assume you do not have a registered account yet, so the next bit might be useful. Here are some pages you might like to see:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (174.101.165.162) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Double Plus Ungood (talk) 07:34, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

October 2016
 Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Louis Sockalexis, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * You may be right. Sorry for jumping the gun on this. I will roll back my edit. However, if the fact you cite is not in the following reference, I suggest you add another reference to verify the fact. Donner60 (talk) 02:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC)