User talk:174.104.231.183

December 2018
Hello, I'm Gladamas. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to G. Edward Griffin seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Gladamas (talk &middot; contribs) 00:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * I removed language intended to create bias in the mind of the reader. If I wrote "G. Edward Griffin tells the truth about the Federal Reserve System," that would be biased. It is equally biased to say that he promotes "false views" about the Federal Reserve System. Which specific views are false? And if some are true and others are not, how do you determine which way to characterize his views? Shouldn't that be up to the reader? Also, using buzz words like "quackery" and "conspiracy theorist" are not neutral. You can say that he supports 9/11 Truth and alternative explanations for the JFK assassination, the reader can conclude on their own whether or not that makes him a "conspiracy theorist." Conspiracy theorist is a derogatory term. It is not neutral.--174.104.231.183 (talk) 01:02, 16 December 2018 (UTC)