User talk:174.127.16.194

Draft:Interoperable Master Format concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Interoperable Master Format, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Interoperable Master Format
Hello, 174.127.16.194. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Interoperable Master Format, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Interoperable Master Format


Hello, 174.127.16.194. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Interoperable Master Format".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2023
Hello, I'm Moriwen. I noticed that you recently removed content from Barry Smolin without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Moriwen (talk) 18:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Barry Smolin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Moriwen (talk) 18:38, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * If there is a news source with updated information, please mention that here or at the article's talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 18:40, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I did give a valid reason. This is inaccurate information that harms the reputation and life of this man. This is false snd inflammatory.  Please allow me to remove it. 174.127.16.194 (talk) 18:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * This is a nuanced response. Please read all of it.
 * You may not remove the information because it is "false and inflammatory". The accusations presented in the article were accurate per the cited source. We do not remove negative information just because it "harms the reputation and life of" a subject.
 * We do, however, have a policy for biographies of living people that has some clear limits for what is included in articles. In the case of a public figure facing criminal charges that are receiving ongoing, widespread media attention, it is appropriate to include the charges. However, Smolin may not rise to that level of celebrity, but more importantly, he has not faced criminal charges, nor has the lawsuit received significant ongoing coverage. Accordingly, I have removed it, not because the statement is inaccurate, but because the mention of the accusations alone in the context of a lawsuit that has yet to go to court is not warranted per WP:BLP. —C.Fred (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)