User talk:174.213.165.246

October 2020
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Tsiolkovsky rocket equation—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 21:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tsiolkovsky rocket equation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 21:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Single-stage-to-orbit, you may be blocked from editing. Isabelle 🔔 21:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that you made a comment in the edit summary of Special:Diff/983196258 that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Edits on Turbopump
I don't see what you're talking about in these edit summaries. First off, you say that pumps displace liquids and compressors displace fluids, and use this as justification for removing sections -- not sure what that even has to do with the sections in the first place (to say nothing of vacuum pumps, getter pumps, etc, which are not compressors and do not generally displace liquid). Compressors are referred to as such because they work against a pressure gradient. Second off, you added a 3,000+ byte, completely unformatted, unsourced go-off into the lede of the article that seemed intended as a "pwn" of the previous editors than encyclopedic content. Even if what you said was correct, perhaps you could bring this up on the talk page instead of writing a long complaint in the body of the article. jp×g 01:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 13 October 2020 (UTC)