User talk:174.24.66.121

August 2021
Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Seattle Aquarium have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dennis Bratland (talk) 01:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Great Lakes Aquarium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sea Life at Mall of America, you may be blocked from editing. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Great Lakes Aquarium. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Nat Gertler (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Sourced information
Wikipedia thrives on sourced information, information that is accompanied by some listed reference that people can check to verify that the claim is true. Verifiability is a key pillar of this project.

Adding the words "DO NOT REVERT!" to your additions does not serve to make the verifiable... and indeed, as those words should not be in the article, they pretty much guarantee at least a partial revert. (Oh, and "an 11 year-old boy" does not qualify as a verifiable source.)

If you have any questions, you can leave them on my talk page. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)