User talk:174.251.64.233

December 2023
Hello, I'm CoconutOctopus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Shirley Temple have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CoconutOctopus  talk  18:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to John Boles (actor). Thank you. mAyLiNgOeEd  (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜)  04:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Mrs. Santa Claus, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Mrs. Santa Claus‎, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Lutheran Church in America. ''That you a topic or that you were  is not a valid reason to add content without any reliable sources. Almost all of your edits (including those made using other IPs) have been reverted, so you're just wasting everybody's time. Please adjust your editing behaviour or find something else to do.'' Felida97 (talk) 13:031, 1 January 2024 (UTC)