User talk:174.60.49.187

September 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Richemont, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chanel, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 23:11, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Lendlease. Uranium Site (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 16:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that in this edit to Deutsche Bank, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hermès, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Pachu Kannan (talk) 14:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Squeakachu. I noticed that you recently removed content from ByteDance without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Squeakachu (talk) 19:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at MediaCityUK, you may be blocked from editing. Cnbrb (talk) 17:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Magnit. Ttwaring (talk) 18:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)