User talk:174.69.5.198

March 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Buzz Lightyear of Star Command—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Lego Movie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Pixar films, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 23:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Monsters, Inc.. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.   ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Wild Chase. Binksternet (talk) 04:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Block evasioni by Special:Contributions/173.19.61.247. Binksternet (talk) 04:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2022
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, I promise I won't edit that again. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 02:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

January 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Please unblock me! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 23:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Why would you do that to that page? Those other titles were good! WHY JUST WHY!?! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't want to be blocked for two whole years! Please unblock me! I don't mean any harm! 😭 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You unblock me this instance I don't want to be blocked for TWO WHOLE YEARS!!! 🤬 I'm always angry when I get blocked! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Can you see me getting more and more angry at all?! That's because I want you to reply a message to me about a promise to me because I don't mean any harm! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * These edits I didn't know better about and they were by accident! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * For the one thousand time reply something to me and unblock me from this in general!!! I'LL JUST VISIT THIS AND EDIT ONLY IF I REALLY HAVE TO!!! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Daniel Case please unblock me! Reply something to me now! 174.69.5.198 (talk) 20:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Daniel Case, I'm so sorry about my disruptive editing I've been doing over the years, and I mean not last time, but the other last times I've been blocked. What I was basically trying to do was seeing if I can make some pages either make more sense, or better, but over the last two months (since my most recent block), I've realized they all don't have to be made like that. I've also realized that there is not very much of a reason to edit here unless there is something in particular I want to edit. I also am sorry about my other messages I've sent you that you probably found harsh to reply. Now, I have been remembering to answer my messages when I receive one. I also have been seeing that some of the pages that I've editing and told not for wrong reasons that they don't need those edits after all. One most important thing I want to try to do now if I (supposedly) get unblocked, is always talk about important pages to edit first before editing them. Leave me a message on what you think about this reply. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Daniel Case, I believe the editor wants your attention. Drmies (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Tell him that I also feel bad and rejected for what I've done the past bad times I've been editing. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 00:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Drmies, according to my message above, the one I told to Daniel Case, would you be able to unblock me or him? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 00:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I will be able to give this better consideration in a couple of days, when I'm back from seeing the eclipse. Daniel Case (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Daniel Case, have you made your consideration yet? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I haven't been able to sit down and look over the record yet due to some other things that have imposed on my time. I am hoping to in the next day or so. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * My weekend is turning out to be more hectic both on-wiki and off- than I thought it would be. Hopefully tomorrow night. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Are you gonna unblock me? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Daniel Case, have you made up your mind of when you are gonna unblock me? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I just got Internet access back after longer time off than I wanted. I do mean to do this, but I'd like also to get the other admins who've blocked you for long periods of time in the past to weigh in. Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Surprisingly
174.69.5.198 (talk) 00:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

So, just to be clear, you are admitting you evaded your block and edited Wikipedia using a different IP address? --Yamla (talk) 11:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes. I've notice my mistakes real quickly and instead of just doing them constantly, I try to think what I need to do the next time I do edit, whenever someone leaves me a message and not do the same edit that they think is disruptive so I won't get blocked. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yamla, have you made your mind yet? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You haven't answered the question I posed. Unless you are saying yes, you evaded your block. In which case, this block should stand. Regardless, it's not me who will review your request. I've already reviewed one. --Yamla (talk) 22:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I did answer your question, saying Yes to it. I know blocks are supposed to stand a lot, but the problem with me is that I've learned how to work on Wikipedia in other locations where I'm still unblocked, to always learn from my edits whenever I receive a message and NEVER do it again. Will you (or another administrator) PLEASE consider unblocking me? You will see how much of a good behaving person I am now to this website. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 14:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Blocks apply to the person, not just the IP address or account. "I've learned how to work on Wikipedia in other locations where I'm still unblocked"; no, this is a clear violation of WP:BLOCK and WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 14:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * What I'm really just trying to say is that I feel bad right now of what I did when I saw that I was blocked the first time and felt very sorry for it, and I want another chance to behave and not constantly make the same mistake over and over again. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 16:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello Yamla. Have you considered about unblocking me with another administrator? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

No more mistake repeating!
174.69.5.198 (talk) 13:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Because of your block evasion I have restarted the this block at its original length of two years. If you evade your block again, you may very well have the block time increased to more than two years. JBW (talk) 20:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Are you too mad with me to unblock me? 174.69.5.198 (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll try to find my own Wikipedia account to sign in to this. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 21:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I also want to know why they should say the Monsters vs. Aliens franchise should a possible sequel or something new in the future, there were other times in the past years where they said nothing would happen again after the failure of the TV series. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


 * If you evade your block by using an account, that will have the same effect as evading it by using another IP address. You have been told what to do in order to be considered for an unblock; why don't you just do it? JBW (talk) 21:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I have been trying to do it, but I have been finding it hard to do it. Can you type in for me instructions to look at? That way I can follow them easily and make the effort to get unblock easier by looking at them more while doing them. 174.69.5.198 (talk) 22:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Read what 331dot wrote above, at 07:16 on the 22nd of April 2024, and do what he said. JBW (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

174.69.5.198 (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


 * It seems that you actually can't understand what you have been told about how to request an unblock, with the result that you keep posting messages and unblock requests which don't indicate any understanding of the reasons for the block. Since this takes up administrators' time without standing any chance of achieving any useful purpose, I have removed your ability to edit this page. When an administrator reviews your latest unblock request they may restore your ability to edit here if they think doing so is appropriate. JBW (talk) 21:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. PhilKnight (talk) 08:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)