User talk:174.91.117.213

January 2023
Hello, I'm PigeonChickenFish. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Killing of Kian Pirfalak have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 05:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * It was not vandalism I added sources in the article 174.91.117.213 (talk) 06:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Killing of Kian Pirfalak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jalen Folf  (talk)  05:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * It was not vandalism I added sources in the article 174.91.117.213 (talk) 06:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Killing of Kian Pirfalak. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 06:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * That was not commentary, my own point of view, or my own personal analysis, I already told you I provided sources for it. The claim that kian was killed by security forces is the point of view of the protestors/rioters/opposition. There were evidences of the attack causing casualties among the security forces as well, so the perpretators were non-state actors. 174.91.117.213 (talk) 06:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi 174.91.117.213! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Killing of Kian Pirfalak several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Jalen Folf  (talk)  06:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, at 174.91.117.213, has made edits that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! PigeonChickenFish (talk) 06:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)