User talk:174.95.70.110

August 2021
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Eileen de Villa—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eileen de Villa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 22:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bonnie Henry. Zefr (talk) 23:26, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eileen de Villa have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Eileen de Villa was changed by 174.95.70.110 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930728 on 2021-08-28T21:19:25+00:00

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 21:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Great Replacement, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 19:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Crime in Canada, you may be blocked from editing. Sjö (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ratna Omidvar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at List of political scandals in Canada, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. KNHaw  (talk)  00:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Amortias (T)(C) 18:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of political scandals in Canada have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of political scandals in Canada was changed by 174.95.70.110 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902276 on 2022-02-28T01:57:42+00:00

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of political scandals in Canada. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. You've been continuing to add inflammatory information to this page after a 3-month block. Mooshua1857 (talk) 02:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of political scandals in Canada. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of political scandals in Canada. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 04:39, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Will you at least concede that Wikipedia has devolved into outright propaganda and is no longer useful?