User talk:174.97.4.238

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page University of South Carolina has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. GarnetAndBlack (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page University of Georgia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. GarnetAndBlack (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to University of South Carolina. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GarnetAndBlack (talk) 23:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at University of South Carolina. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. GarnetAndBlack (talk) 03:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Resveratrol
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Resveratrol. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Note edit summaries in and. --Ronz (talk) 14:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

If there's anything to your rationale, it needs to be explained better on the talk page. --Ronz (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)