User talk:175.100.9.165

July 2021
Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that in this edit to Craigarogan, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Craigarogan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:GOV. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:28, 6 July 2021 (UTC)