User talk:175.33.39.91

August 2022
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Ralph Babet. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. aricooperdavis (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2022 (UTC)


 * @Aricooperdavis thanks, what examples specifically are you referring to? 175.33.39.91 (talk) 10:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi @175.33.39.91. I was referring to this revision, in particular the second sentence "It is unclear who Babet perceives these Marxists to be, or if they are in the room with us right now.". The first part of your edit could be a positive contribution to the article if you cite a source for it. All the best, aricooperdavis (talk) 10:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Aricooperdavis thanks, citation added 175.33.39.91 (talk) 10:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Great, that's much better! I've made some slight style changes, such as turning your link into a full citation, and ensuring that the content is fully supported by the source. Thanks for your contribution. aricooperdavis (talk) 10:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ralph Babet. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Whilst your observation about his head symmetry is entertaining, it's also original research and not in keeping with the Manual of Style, and therefore inappropriate for WIkipedia. aricooperdavis (talk) 11:17, 26 August 2022 (UTC)