User talk:175.45.116.64

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Christian Slater has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Christian Slater was changed by 175.45.116.64 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946928 on 2016-01-11T01:50:43+00:00.

November 2016
Hello, I'm RedPanda25. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cootamundra, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RedPanda25 22:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016
Hello, I'm Zhaofeng Li. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Genealogical DNA test— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zhaofeng Li talk (Please &#123;&#123;Ping&#125;&#125; when replying) 02:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Simplexity22. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pincer movement without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mr. Bean (character). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 01:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mr. Bean (character), you may be blocked from editing. — Smjg (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, I'm Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sydney have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * This is vandalism. Why did you delete it man.

Your recent editing history at Sydney shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:46, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Anthony Maroon. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)