User talk:176.233.27.205

October 2023
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gülermak without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am really an amateur in Wikipedia for content contribution. I am working for the company And realize that the two news mentioned in the contraversery section is wrong And misleading. I kindly ask you to remove them.
 * best regards 176.233.27.205 (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * First things first, if you work for the company, you should not edit the article. You can request changes you believe should be made via the article's talk page. Second, what do you mean when you say "wrong and misleading"? The controversies section is cited with reference to news articles. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You are right. as I wrote I have no experience at thing platform. For the news articles, they are not correct and written for political purposes. There is no Technically correct thing in these news articles. 176.233.27.205 (talk) 19:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay; do you have any evidence to back up the assertion that these articles are completely and wholly false? AntiDionysius (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * For the First one, The company did not Work at Ankara Konya High speed train Project. Even the heading is wrong. There was another project where the two partner companies work at. The accident mentioned was because of bas Acciona of the operating company. And the companies were not Faced with a punishment beacause  of being late. All time Extensions were received with no penalty. For the second news article, Gülermak Paid to the subcontractor but the subcontractor did not pay to his workers. Our Managers made a deal with the Öner of the subcontractor and cut the progressive payment of the subcontractor and pay the salaries Directly to the workers.   I  am working for 25 years and our bosses are not that kind of people. Therefore I tried to remove the news articles. Besides of all succesfull past, it is so cruel to see those misleading information. Thank you for your Interest.. regards 176.233.27.205 (talk) 20:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * On the first issue, there are several sources which say that Gülermak was indeed involved with signalling on the Ankara-Konya line.
 * On the second issue, the existing text merely says "there were reported issues with salary payments for the company's workers"; if you're saying that the subcontractor didn't pay the workers, then that sentence is true. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I am only writing to correct the news and understood you Will not be convinced. Commuter Rail was being operated without signalization. Decision was taken by TCDD. Temporary acceptance was done without signalization. Tccd was taken to the court not the contractors. Misleading.
 * for the second öne, contractor paid to the subcontractor but he did not pay to the workers.  Will you pay something twice? The reported should refer to the subcontractor, not the mani contractor
 * thank you again. Good night. 176.233.27.205 (talk) 20:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)