User talk:176.52.105.202

Regarding the issues you are commenting on at WP:AE
That board is not an appropriate place to resolve them. If you have issues with that administrator on the wikis on which he is active, you will need to resolve those issues on the appropriate wikis.

If you cannot or will not, continued commenting in the vein that you are will be seen to constitute harassment and you may be blocked from editing accordingly. Izno (talk) 21:46, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Fascism is an ideology and socio-political movement, as well as the dictatorial regime established on their basis. I believe that Q-bit Array is a dictator. I knew what I was getting into when I wrote this, that’s why I asked him to block me, as an honest person. I don’t understand why Wikipedia doesn’t have a structure that operates like the international UN. "International Judicial Board of Global Wikipedia" with the right to decide which administrator can be removed from office, on any part of Wikipedia, be it Russian or Japanese. That would be fair and just. 176.52.105.202 (talk) 22:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Attention, I am using a machine translator, I do not speak English, I apologize in advance if the translations are incorrect and offensive. In our country, the word fascism is used to describe any dictatorship. I don’t know what harassment is. But it’s Q-bit Array who haunts me on Russian Wikipedia, always and everywhere. 176.52.105.202 (talk) 22:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * User talk:Q-bit array
 * After looking at Kubit’s page, I realized that I’m not the only one, he blocks a lot of people on their personal ambitions. Here is the text from his meta wiki page, translated from Russian into English:
 * My complaints to you
 * Mr. Q bit-array, I hope that now you will listen to me and answer all my questions. You blocked me for 1 year, deleting almost all my edits. You accuse me of bypassing the block. You know, I’ll honestly say that this is nonsense and paranoia. You deleted my edits in the article The Presidency of John F. Kennedy, the Kennedy Clan, the Ivanovka Incident (a typo was generally corrected there - from White Guard to White Guard), Walter Cronkite, cruiser Sverdlov, etc. Tell me, do you even read what you delete? Or so, at random. Yes, it turns out that you yourself are engaged in vandalism. Okay, me. I will give other examples. Anonymous contributors continually return edits to articles by Robert and Edward Kennedy. You turn everything back and block them, accusing them... of bypassing the block. Tell me why you are not satisfied with the added photos or information that is true. But isn't that so? Didn't the Kennedys oppose the Vietnam War, and wasn't Edward active in politics? You block everyone who you personally dislike. Question: How did I annoy you, a person living in Germany, so much? If you are interested in reading about yourself, then type in about yourself - Q bit-array (Wikireality). It says about you that you delete information without delving into the essence of the matter. By your actions, you drove Viktpedia into a swamp, where, to be honest, I was afraid to do something for the last time.
 * An example of another vandalism: on April 27, 2018, anonymous 5.143.0.95 returned my edits to the Robert Kennedy article. Here anonymous person 188.162.64.14 comes out of nowhere, brazenly deleting edits. Reimu Hakurei, who returned the edits, does not help either. An anonymous deleter writes you a slander. The first anonymous person also writes to you, saying that all this is slander. What are you doing? Of course, you support the deleter and block that participant on charges of... bypassing an imaginary block. If I deleted other people's edits like this, I would be blocked in 5 minutes. Yes, the legend is fresh, but it’s hard to believe.
 * So, I demand an answer to my questions above. I intend to enter into dialogue with you. 176.52.105.202 (talk) 22:42, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
Hi there. As the instructions at the top of WP:AE state, IP editors and non-autoconfirmed editors are not allowed to file requests at that noticeboard. Additionally the actions of an ruwiki admin on ruwiki are out of scope for any dispute resolution noticeboard on enwiki. I would suggest that you look into the dispute resolution process on ruwiki as we cannot help you here. Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:51, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The problem is that in Russian Wikipedia he is the most important Boss who cannot be defeated. The point is that I don’t know English, I’m writing through a machine translator, so it’s difficult for me to figure it out here. The problem is that Russian Wikipedia is a field of complete anarchy, the rules don’t work there like they do here. People from the USSR have the habits of dictators like Stalin. The rules in Russian Wikipedia are dictated by administrators based on their personal beliefs. In Russian Wikipedia, 30% of articles are without authoritative sources. But if you add an authoritative source, it can still be canceled because someone doesn’t like it, and no one cares that it’s a scientifically proven fact. There I work on historical data on the Altai peoples. This administrator is harassing me there and I don’t have time to create a new page, he combs me out and blocks me for no reason. It’s sad that global Wikipedia cannot remove such dictators from the administration who don’t even issue warnings or explain the essence of the blocking and who violated what. Thank you very much for the explanation. The admins here are more professional. Forgive my anger, it’s just sometimes infuriating that nothing can be done with dictators. 176.52.105.202 (talk) 22:06, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I don’t know where to turn, how to solve the problem, no one wants to understand the problem, so I decided to ask for help here. But instead of answering, they started canceling my request, and I don’t know English and don’t understand the reason for the cancellation. Global administrators should be given the power to have the right to appoint and remove administrators of other Wikipedias based on the "Wikipedia Court Panel". Otherwise, dictators will revel in their flattery and turn Wikipedia into their personal sandbox and possessions. But people won’t be able to complain about them anywhere. Even in the world there is a UN to solve global problems. 176.52.105.202 (talk) 22:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I hope the machine translator conveys my text correctly. If I accidentally offended or insulted someone, then forgive me, it’s not me, but Google Translator. 176.52.105.202 (talk) 22:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Izno (talk) 21:51, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.