User talk:177.40.130.54

November 2021
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Do not edit war, and do not cause subtle vandalism InternetScavenger89 (talk) 17:35, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm InternetScavenger89. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Do not edit war. This is your last warning'' InternetScavenger89 (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. InternetScavenger89 (talk) 17:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC) -- Internet Scavenger 89
 * You are unable to read? literally you have restored albanian vandalism sock edit of User:Zemertrimi. literally per article travunian dynasty was serbian and served principality of serbia of middle ages. And Metohije was serbian per article. Stop vandalizing and do disruptive and edit warring. Stop acting like a bot
 * This is not assuming good faith, and it is not acceptable. Please explain why you call me a bot. Vandalism and consistent edit-warring InternetScavenger89 (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC).
 * Hello 177.40.130.54. If you continue this type of edit with no discussion, and continue with the personal attacks, you are likely to be blocked from editing. EdJohnston (talk) 17:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I literally explained above, i am assuming good faith, if they want to cover ears and scream, its not my fault
 * A) Learn how to indent properly, B) Learn how to sign your posts & C) Stop making contentious edits on articles & engage at those article's talkpage & seek a consensus for your proposed changes. GoodDay (talk) 17:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You are clearly doing the cover ears and scream act.
 * If you wanna be blocked, then that's your choice. GoodDay (talk) 18:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — T ALK — C ONTRIBS  — S ANDBOXES  — L OGS  — 17:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You are clearly wrong. My edit summary is right. He restored User:Zemertrimi sock vandalism. I just reverted because the name "pejes" is not english name, but pec, see example Patriarchate of Peć (monastery).


 * If there is anything else i can do to assist in fixing this issue, please let me know. -- Internet Scavenger 89  18:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Even through it is an Edit Warring Violation. The Best advice I can give you is to be very Careful and not Edit war in the future Chip3004 (talk) 18:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 20:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gospel of St. Nicholas of Rošci (December 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gospel of St. Nicholas of Rošci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gospel of St. Nicholas of Rošci, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gospel_of_St._Nicholas_of_Ro%C5%A1ci Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gospel_of_St._Nicholas_of_Ro%C5%A1ci reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)