User talk:178.101.62.111

November 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to British Horseracing Authority has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: British Horseracing Authority was changed by 178.101.62.111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860057 on 2018-11-24T14:17:50+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at British Horseracing Authority. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AnEditor1234 (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to British Horseracing Authority. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 15:38, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

British Horseracing Authority
I infer from your edits that you have strong views on the topic of the British Horseracing Authority.

This is a reminder that articles on Wikipedia should be written from a neutral point of view, following what is stated in reliable sources rather than our own opinions.

The article on the British Horseracing Authority does lack a good perspective of the topic and would greatly benefit from the addition of information derived from reliable secondary sources (e.g. articles in serious newspapers, academic publications, etc.). If you can find such sources and summarise what they have to say in the article it would be a service to our readers. But please remember to disregard your own opinions and write neutrally, summarising what reliable sources say even when you disagree with it. If you can't bring yourself to do that I suggest that you edit an article about something else. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 15:46, 24 November 2018 (UTC)