User talk:178.138.33.208

August 2021
Hello, I'm Tymon.r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Parent—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Tymon. r Do you have any questions?  11:12, 6 August 2021 (UTC)


 * first, the edit makes no sense, and it was right to be reversed. i am more concerned about who could have done it, since i can't imagine a troubled enough state that would have generated this. second, the edits don't have to be "constructive", which is a tongue in cheek for canned. i wonder if wikipedia can't imagine new signs, like a particular type of quotes or a link to the erased edits in the case of the controversial, but potentially game changing contributions; sure, lucidity would be advised, since the lies and propaganda would take advantage of this opportunity way before the truth. in fact, the greatest merit of wikipedia compared to the classical encyclopedias was just that for many years - to legalize many uncomfortable truths (be it as "allegations" and "what if"s) and answer the questions nobody else answered (like "is this fruit edible?"), so this won't even be new, only a return to normalcy. 178.138.33.208 (talk) 09:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)