User talk:178.148.1.161

Michael Scharf
If you feel there is an error in a sentence in something he wrote, take it up with him directly. A wikipedia article is not the place for that. - Richfife (talk) 04:51, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't feel, I reason. 178.148.1.161 (talk) 07:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC) saved by the WP:SYN, even though it is so obvious.


 * I'm neutral about the whole section (I wouldn't take it out, but I wouldn't put it back either), but not because it's uncited. The problem is it's arguably Spam.   It's arguably not spam, but I'm not putting my horse in that particular race.  If someone else takes exception, it'll be up to you to argue your case more thoroughly. - Richfife (talk) 15:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree, it is quite self-promotional. 178.148.1.161 (talk) 19:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * p.s. Note this line from WP:V: "any material whose verifiability ... is likely to be challenged".  It's very unlikely that anyone is going to challenge that the course material exists or that he wrote it. - Richfife (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * But I do challenge that it is the first MOOC on the topic! 178.148.1.161 (talk) 23:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * If it's something that might be libelous, you take it out. If it just smells funny, you put a  next to it. - Richfife (talk) 00:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)