User talk:178.194.229.85

April 2022
Hello, I'm PureRED. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Diplomatic law have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Pure RED &#124;  talk to me   &#124; 19:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)


 * It is an interesting comment. You prefer to do automatic deleting of valuable contributions for a formal and mechanical policy which you even label 'vandalism'. Vandalism is to misguide reader by telling them that diplomacy is 'spa each act'. It cannot pass lauthe gh test. What about diplomatic documents. I won't comment on other layers of defthe inition of diplomacy. Remove reference to the source and keep defthe inition. Otherwise, you are doing maja or dis-service to pubthe lic good by promoting misinformation and fake news. 178.194.229.85 (talk) 08:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Diplomacy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 00:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)