User talk:178.215.106.9

December 2017
Findings of the McLaren Report are based on the empirical evidence that was provided by Rodchenkov and other whistleblowers. You cited that 'Rodchenkov's reliability as a source has been fiercely questioned in Russia' but it was Russia who had chosen to appoint him as head of the Moscow laboratory after all his mental issues. Furthermore, he was awarded the Order of Friendship personally by Putin. Based on all these facts I made a decision to revert your recent edits. Cskamoscow100 (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

/* December 2017 */ 178.215.106.9 (talk) 08:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)I added an official opinion by the Russian Investigative Committee into the "Reactions' section. As far as I understand this particular section is not about Findings of the McLaren Report but about reaction to Rodchenkov action. If the reaction was like this what is the reason to cover it up? I feel that it IS important to know Russian reaction because the doubts about reliability of Rodchenkov as a source is a key point of different approach to his testimonies. "The investigators put Rodchenkov on an international wanted list. Our court on September 21 ,2017 issued a ruling to arrest him in absentia since he is wanted internationally," the court's spokeswoman, Yunona Tsareva, said. I wonder if is also prohibited to inform westerners about that. Also, You wrote that "it was Russia who had chosen to appoint him as head of the Moscow laboratory after all his mental issues'- yes, and it was WADA who accepted this and certified his lab though it was known about investigation started in 2011 against his sister for buying and possessing banned drugs. Also, your remark 'he was awarded the Order of Friendship personally by Putin" is not the reason to delete mine, because Putin awarded him earlier (January 2015), and the reaction I wrote was much later, when investigation has started. In a word, since the topic is so sensitive and western media afford to be very emotional about this, why to replace Russian opinion by 'more neutral paragraph'?!