User talk:178.255.168.200

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lillian Berlin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lillian Berlin was changed by 178.255.168.200 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898024 on 2020-10-22T14:03:05+00:00

November 2020
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:10, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

April 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 09:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * Yamla: The film has not been released yet but I guess that doesn't matter. I will enjoy the three months doing something useful instead of helping/vandalizing Wikipedia. --178.255.168.200 (talk) 11:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:CITE from a reliable source. --Yamla (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yamla: Can you prove it was released in 2022? --178.255.168.200 (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I didn't introduce that date. If you believe it was wrong but did not have a reliable citation, you should have used template:citation needed. See also, WP:TRUTH. --Yamla (talk) 12:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yamla: I do not believe it is wrong, I know it is wrong, as does the Internet (and you surely do too). If I'd put the word "upcoming" (which is used in the film article) into the brackets instead of the year, would I also break some wiki rules? --178.255.168.200 (talk) 13:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you know it is wrong, it should be easy to find a citation. Basically, Wikipedia isn't the slightest bit interested in what you know, only what you can cite. I wouldn't object to "upcoming" instead of the year, mind you. --Yamla (talk) 13:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I just found a page here called "You don't need to cite that the sky is blue", that's a nice page name, isn't it? Anyway, OK, I'll fix it in three months. Until then it will be incorrect per Wikipedia's wishes. --178.255.168.200 (talk) 14:01, 8 April 2023 (UTC)