User talk:179.182.129.206

April 2019
Hello, I'm Mdaniels5757. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fascism in Europe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Richard J. Jensen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 22:32, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

{{ Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

{{The edit-summary field}}

I noticed your recent edit to Communist Party does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in: {{Div col|colwidth=20em}} {{Div col end}} Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting {{myprefs|3|check=Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary}}. Thanks! --David Tornheim (talk) 02:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Hi
I noticed some of your edits. As I mentioned above, please make sure to put in an edit summary. I would also recommend that if you revert the work of established editors as you did with, , and , that you open up a talk page section in the article explaining why you reverted them. It is important to work collaboratively with editors, so see if you can find some common ground, if you think at least some of their edit has merit and possibly propose language that is agreeable to everyone. Even if you can't find agreement, there are way to move forward. What you do not want is an edit war for which you might easily be blocked. --David Tornheim (talk) 02:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Also, please read WP:BRD. This will help you understand the process of adding controversial changes and reverting them. --David Tornheim (talk) 02:37, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, I'm Jannik Schwaß. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Block of Wikipedia in Venezuela have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 05:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 12:13, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.