User talk:17purdyr

I reverted your changes to Anna Anderson, assuming you made the edit in good faith. When you make a drastic change like that, you really need to put something in the summary, or on the talk page, explaining why. It doesn't have to be much, but at least some rationale in the Edit Summary. Dennis Brown (talk) 22:22, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

March 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Socialism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 23:57, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Republicanism, you may be blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Socialism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RolandR (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arain (Delhi) was changed by 17purdyr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967033 on 2012-08-29T22:29:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TMCk (talk) 22:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism and unsourced changes to articles to promote a particular point of view. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dianna (talk) 01:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Kuru beat me to it. I have looked at all of your edits, and they are without exception either unsourced, opinionated or out-and-out wrong. Even if you are not deliberately being disruptive. your are certainly, by your edits, degrading the encyclopedia. Any further unblock request will need to contain:-


 * A committment to specify acceptable dsources for your edits;
 * A committment not to insert your personal political opinions into articles;
 * A committment to use article talk-pages, in advance of major article changes and deletions, to discuss your proposed changes;
 * An explanation of your failure to pay attention to warnings sent to you, and still present on this page.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:16, 11 September 2012 (UTC)