User talk:180.190.114.163

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (180.190.114.163) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  06:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:46, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ferdinand Marcos. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 04:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ferdinand Marcos, you may be blocked from editing. From the looks of your edits, it is clear that you are Pro-Marcos and an Anti-Aquino. You are disrupting the neutrality balance of the articles that you are editing. This violates the neutral point of view policy of Wikipedia. If you want to "revise" history and tilt the neutrality of the articles involving the Marcoses and Aquinos to favor Marcos, please post them on a different platform. Not here. -WayKurat (talk) 08:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Use of edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! North America1000 04:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Re: Pro-Marcos edits
If you want to discuss your edits, fine. Please discuss them here so that other Pinoy editors will check if your contributions are "neutral". -WayKurat (talk) 09:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)