User talk:180.191.67.31

September 2012
Hello, I'm GoShow. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Philippine Lotto Draw because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. GoShow (...............) 03:54, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I redid it and added more. How is it not helpful?

Philippine Lotto Draw
Wikipedia is not the place to discuss your ideas. If you can find a reliable source that does have this information, please do add a synopsis of it along with a citation to that source. Thank you for your contributions Jim1138 (talk) 06:36, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 07:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

There are allegations that it is the lotto in the Philippine sis rigged. That gambling money is laundered through the PCSO. And this is my input! So stop changing what I write, bitch!

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 07:19, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Of course we can add original ideas or ideas not mentioned in the article yet, but have been mentioned elsewhere. My statement is also a logical hypothesis!

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Philippine Lotto Draw. Jim1138 (talk) 07:25, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Who the hell are you? Do you get paid by the officials at PCSO to cover up their corrupt activities.

Wikipedia must be verifiable
Please source your statements see WP:V and WP:RS unsourced claims may be removed. Jim1138 (talk) 07:38, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Why don't you remove the whole article then since you only have 1 source as to where one of the big ones was won. I suspect that you are involved in an organization paid by others to ensure that those other's websites are one-sided towards them! I will report you!


 * You can request it. See wp:afd. Why don't you discuss your concerns on talk:Philippine Lotto Draw. I have no problem with you putting anything up on the article, so long as it does not conflict with Wikipedia policy. If you have an article on fraud in the Philippine Lotto Draw, put up a summary and cite the article. What you seem to be doing appears to be posting your own opinion, which is termed original research, and is strongly frowned upon in Wikipedia. You can also indicate that areas of the article need a source: use    which will put up a "Citation needed" flag. Be careful not to over do it.  Also, try a Template:Unreferenced or Template:cleanup Cheers Jim1138 (talk)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 07:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Better yet, why do you do your own research since you are so concerned about others posting. If I post, you might just say it is erroneous! So why don't you do that? Is it because you or your organization get paid by others to clean up articles to show them in a bright light? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.191.60.175 (talk) 23:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)