User talk:180.249.78.251

Boltzmann brain
Sup playa

Over at Boltzmann brain you removed as inappropriate a sentence from the pedagogy section. In what way is it inappropriate?

There are two parts to the sentence:

"No" Which succinctly answers the question under discussion at that point. The explanation is long so this serves as a quick response to help readers identify that which is otherwise hard to recognise because of the technical nature of the other explanations.

"did you not read the introduction" Which points readers to the source material used to answer the question, and further serves as a motif throughout the pedagogy section to which the reader can anchor themselves (used at the start of the three main points).

Look bra, it is not very constructive to delete the things and just wave your hands saying "inappropriate" without attempting to explain how it is supposed to be inappropriate (you never establish) and neither have you replaced the content in anyway which was being used for three seperate and constructive purposes within that section of the text.