User talk:180degreesbrandcom

November 2022
Hello, I'm DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DarkAudit (talk) 08:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Duduk by EcoWorld


A tag has been placed on Duduk by EcoWorld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fram (talk) 14:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello 180degreesbrandcom. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:180degreesbrandcom. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Fram (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Fram, sorry for not dislose. I will disclose it once unblock my userpage.  180degreesbrandcom (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Here is my disclose -> 180degreesbrandcom (talk) 02:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of EcoWorld


A tag has been placed on EcoWorld, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fram (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

UnBlock userpage to disclosed paid editor
Hi @Jimfbleak, Kindly help to unblock my user page in order disclosed paid editor in my userpage according to wikipedia guidelines. 180degreesbrandcom (talk) 02:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * You should have disclosed your COI before you started writing your article which was a blatant promo for the company sourced to the company itself. You clearly made no effort to read any of our guidance on editing, references, conflict of interest or advertising. You can request an unblock using and a different admin will review the request. You should note, however, that it is likely to be a condition of any unblock that you don't write about the company or related topics. An unblock isn't a licence to carry on advertising Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I note now that your username represents a company, which is also forbidden, so you also need to request a new username, use instead of the template above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I have try my best to read guidance on editing, references, conflict of interest or advertising. And understand that wikipedia is not part of social media platform. I admit my fault that did not disclose myself as paid editor.
 * But i found out that there is no articles that is talk about - EcoWorld. Hence, i still write but will adjust the content.

Disclosed as paid editor
180degreesbrandcom (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Request for unblock with new username

 * Understood it might sound advertising. As it is actually the same way of writing as this page. - S P setia.
 * I am trying to write on my client brand that is existing in my country - malaysia to talk about the history and developments.
 * Sorry that i am not asking for promoting. But it will be a research platform to let reader to know about the history and developments of ecoworld. 180degreesbrandcom (talk) 11:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * hi @Yamla please do let me know that what i can be do or adjust on my content ? thanks. 180degreesbrandcom (talk) 11:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, "it will be a research platform to let reader to know about the history and developments of ecoworld" is considered promotion on Wikipedia. That's not what we want. 331dot (talk) 11:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You have made a very, very serious accusation that S P Setia have been acting inappropriately. I expect you to provide firm evidence that they have violated WP:COI. Alternatively, I expect you to retract your very serious accusation. As to your own content, I've already told you that you won't be unblocked to continue promoting your clients. If this is your goal, this is the end of the line. --Yamla (talk) 11:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Yamla
 * Sorry for my serious accusation. I not sure why it is promoting as my thought was just listing out the information that talk about my client.
 * And according to the guideline that i read yes i understand wiki is not allowed bias. And, i have tons of relevant sources to citate my contents and if the writing style that is not suitable. My side here still able to do adjust.
 * In this case, everyone is not allow to write about my client ? 180degreesbrandcom (talk) 12:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You have not provided evidence of the WP:COI violation and have not retracted your accusation. Additionally, it's quite clear that you haven't bothered to even read WP:COI and WP:PROMO, despite being blocked for it. I'm sorry, I'm done here. We expect you to put in at least some effort. Don't ping me again. --Yamla (talk) 12:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I will just add that yes, others who attempt to edit about your clients will most likely be blocked as sock puppets or meat puppets of you, because you're blocked. This is what happens when people do not do some appropriate research about how to contribute. 331dot (talk) 12:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I said above "you do not tell us what edits you plan to make now that you know you won't be permitted to, at least for now, edit about your company or its clients". Someone else will review your request, but you seem to be saying you will continue to edit about your clients and don't address how you will comply with WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I will wait some other admin to review my request. Just to point up. Yes I am definitely will continue to edit about my client company. But if you are asking how i comply with Wp: Paid.
 * i already did disclose my self as paid editor (after been block) and my mistake on not disclose as never know it was quite a simple step to put in on talk page. 180degreesbrandcom (talk) 10:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * is closed(directing them back here). 331dot (talk) 12:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Connected contributor (paid)
180degreesbrandcom (talk) 03:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Request for unblock with new username at the same time to contribute article for WP:MY

 * Plus point, if really want to know which part of content will be amend. I can able to place it here for review. But I am not sure whether it is allow to place my revised content here for review. Thanks 180degreesbrandcom (talk) 04:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)