User talk:181.21.145.122

May 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Discredited HIV/AIDS origins theories has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:05, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Discredited HIV/AIDS origins theories was changed by 181.21.145.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880273 on 2019-05-06T23:05:31+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Discredited HIV/AIDS origins theories. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 23:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Discredited HIV/AIDS origins theories, you may be blocked from editing. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 23:08, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Discredited HIV/AIDS origins theories. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 23:08, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Discredited HIV/AIDS origins theories shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 23:11, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 23:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)