User talk:182.176.186.20

May 2019
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Prophets and messengers in Islam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NJA  &#124; talk  15:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Table of prophets of Abrahamic religions, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 06:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Table of prophets of Abrahamic religions. bonadea contributions talk 07:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Mr Bonadea I have provided references then why you are erasing it ?? I require your reason now
 * Edit-warring is prohibited in wikipedia. See WP:3RR. You could end up being banned for a long time. I suggest you start a discussion on the talk page of the article voicing your dissatisfaction on getting your edits reverted repeatedly instead. You can provide your sources and proposed changes there, ask for other wikipedia editors to look at your proposal and assist you in getting it into wikipedia or making you understand why it can't. Also, do consider registering to avoid getting penalties for actions of others who might share this IP with you. Usedtobecool (talk) 07:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Several things: there were no sources for your assertion, you gave a couple of sources that said one thing, and then you, yourself drew a conclusion based on those sources and added that to the article. That is original research which is not allowed in Wikipedia. Secondly, the claim had no place in this article at all - it was basically just a point of view of a certain religious group concerning another religious group. The article about Ahmadiyyas discusses these different views (and that article has also had to be protected due to religiously motivated disruption). Th article that lists prophets in various religious faiths is not a place to discuss those faiths, and absolutely not to make claims about their "validity" - an irrelevant concept as far as Wikipedia is concerned. --bonadea contributions talk 08:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

You abrogated my rights over expressing facts based on Sacred scriptures. Snatching away my rights and blocking me is not wikipedia policy but rather your own moral corruption. You said I am making my own conclusion but no you are wrong, the reference link of the verse on Prophethood is the law of Almighty God in the Holy Qur'an which you can never change or revert or erase. If Mr. bonadea, you are a member of ahmaddiya community then you should make a separate column for expressing your beliefs. Do not illegally and unethically insert your beliefs into other religions. Your false and misleading information is vandalism. If you are fair enough at wikipedia and you follow social and moral code of conducts then unblock me and provide me opportunity to edit the article strictly based on reference and source documents which is actually wikipedia policy. If you have to discuss over references you are free to talk upon it, but blocking me and deleting by footnote is not acceptable in any circumstances.

Mr. Bonadea make a separate column of your beliefs, but you should not interfere or vandalize with other religions.


 * I did not block you, an administrator did, and please do not speculate about the beliefs of other editors. The links you added as references did not mention the Ahmadiyyas and so any conclusions drawn about Ahmadiyyas (or Buddhists or Baptists or any other religious group that's not mentioned in the source) is original research, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. More information here. And the fact remains that the discussion is out of place in the article, for reasons explained above. --bonadea contributions talk 10:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Even if your conclusions were supported by evidence, the fact remains that Ahmadiyya is a branch of Islam, just with beliefs which may be slightly different than traditional Islamic beliefs. Same way that Mormonism is a branch of Christianity, even if it has beliefs which are different than the traditional Christian beliefs. That's why even though most Christians don't consider Jospeh Smith a prophet, he is listed as one in the table. Rockstone   talk to me!   18:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Temporary Block
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating WP:NOR, as done at Table of prophets of Abrahamic religions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Rockstone  talk to me!   18:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

''I am not the person who blocked you (I am not an administrator). I am just posting this so that you know what to do if you want to appeal your block. Thanks'' Rockstone   talk to me!   18:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)