User talk:182.239.82.14

Visa policy of Qatar
OK here's the problem: the Qatari government's website never specifically mentioned Macau as one of the countries and territories eligible for visa exemption which means that MSAR passport holders DO require a visa unless the contrary has been proven from one of its official sources. C-GAUN (talk) 23:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

On your edit summary, you claim that "the visa waiver is equilvalent (sic) to the free visa on arrival, which specified that you do not have to pay for the visa, same policy as before. The Macau Government confirms that the visa on arrival." Yet you forcefully insert Macau as one of the visa-free countries which is contrary to your own claim. I have no idea why you keep doing this as the MSAR government confirmed that it is a form of visa on arrival with more stringent requirements here which specified that MSAR passport holders must also hold travel vouchers and credit cards, something visa-exempted visitors do not need to provide. C-GAUN (talk) 23:43, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

3RR Warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. C-GAUN (talk) 23:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. C-GAUN (talk) 23:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)