User talk:182Jack

December 2015
Hello, I'm AsceticRose. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tom Coughlan (football) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. - Ascetic Rosé   15:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Tom Coughlan (football)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Tom Coughlan (football) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --allthefoxes (Talk) 14:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Tom Coughlan (football)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Tom Coughlan (football) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

BLP
Hi. If you have concerns on balance or other WP:BLPSTYLE issues can you please raise them - so we can figure out what to do about it? Unexplained or unilateral blanking of cited content is not typically in keeping with relevant policies, and will likely just be reverted. As it has been. 5 or 6 times now. So please take another tack. And raise your concern under the project norms for collaborative improvement. Guliolopez (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tom Coughlan (football), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. As per previous advisories above, blanking content without explanation is often considered disruptive, and could result in a block. If you explain your reason for removing content, other editors can then understand, review and consider the validity of those edits. Anything else is an exercise in time wasting. Guliolopez (talk) 12:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 11:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Guliolopez (talk) 14:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)