User talk:183.83.93.218

≠== September 2018 == Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jac 16888 Talk 15:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2018

 * I'll add that this is a long-term abuse case. I've seen this editor blocked for the same behaviour before, repeatedly (though I'd be hard-pressed to find their other IPs). Huon (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Here's just one example.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Unblock Request
(183.83.93.218 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)).

Unblock Request?
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:27, 19 September 2018 (UTC)